|
|
Post by GK Sierra on Oct 24, 2013 1:00:55 GMT
Are you alligating that it isn't one? >implying allegations
>2013
>implying it's greentext if it's not green
>mon visage quand |
|
|
|
Post by Señor Goose on Oct 24, 2013 4:49:28 GMT
>2013
>implying it's greentext if it's not green
>mon visage quand>2013 >Thinking greentext needs to be green >Being this semantical >Shiggy diggy |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 24, 2013 19:14:12 GMT
...I see.  |
|
|
|
Post by Mezzaphor on Oct 25, 2013 4:27:59 GMT
>2013
>implying it's greentext if it's not green
>mon visage quand>2013 >Thinking greentext needs to be green >Being this semantical >Shiggy diggy
>such rebel
>wow |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 25, 2013 15:45:50 GMT
>2013 >Thinking greentext needs to be green >Being this semantical >Shiggy diggy
>such rebel
>wow...you know what? I don't geet it |
|
|
|
Post by GK Sierra on Oct 25, 2013 17:57:20 GMT
>breakin the rules
>such rebel
>wow ...you know what? I don't geet it  Fear not. All will be revealed. |
|
|
|
Post by TBeholder on Oct 25, 2013 20:04:10 GMT
>breakin the rules
>such rebel
>wow ...you know what? I don't geet it After analyzing the statement using a centrifugue in our laboratory it was found that the object consists of the reference to the source of its poster's avatar and "approving" mockery of "be non-conformist, drop lipstick on your keyboard" attention-craving annoyance.  |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 26, 2013 1:28:48 GMT
...you know what? I don't geet it Fear not. All will be revealed. ...is that a paler version of Garfield that's in a good mood? |
|
|
|
Post by Señor Goose on Oct 26, 2013 2:36:49 GMT
Fear not. All will be revealed. ...is that a paler version of Garfield that's in a good mood? |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 26, 2013 3:37:16 GMT
...is that a paler version of Garfield that's in a good mood? >2013 >GARFIELD. JON ARBUCKLE'S WORST NIGHTMARE. |
|
|
|
Post by Gotolei on Oct 26, 2013 5:23:46 GMT
>2004 + 32>Not knowing grafics cat >2013 >GARFIELD. JON ARBUCKLE'S WORST NIGHTMARE.
just HOW HIGH do you even have to BE just to DO something like this... .. , |
|
Søren
Junior Member
Pursuing Authenticity
Posts: 78
|
Post by Søren on Oct 26, 2013 18:59:12 GMT
what has HAPPENED to this topick
just HOW HIGH do you even have to BE just to DO something like this... .. , Quite high, as it so happens. |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 26, 2013 20:13:22 GMT
what has HAPPENED to this topick
just HOW HIGH do you even have to BE just to DO something like this... .. , Quite high, as it so happens. Well, I think someone said "haters gonna hate," to which I replied, "potaters gonna potate" and then someone else said "Alligators gonna alligate?" and I asked what alligate was... and then people started making a bunch of allegation thingies? |
|
Omnium
Junior Member
Posts: 58 
|
Post by Omnium on Oct 26, 2013 20:17:48 GMT
Quite high, as it so happens. Well, I think someone said "haters gonna hate," to which I replied, "potaters gonna potate" and then someone else said "Alligators gonna alligate?" and I asked what alligate was... and then people started making a bunch of allegation thingies? For the record, alligation is a method of solving problems related to mixtures of ingredients |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 26, 2013 20:21:41 GMT
Well, I think someone said "haters gonna hate," to which I replied, "potaters gonna potate" and then someone else said "Alligators gonna alligate?" and I asked what alligate was... and then people started making a bunch of allegation thingies? For the record, alligation is a method of solving problems related to mixtures of ingredients I was very confused, going through 3 days of people posting a bunch of 'allegations'  I didn't know what they were... wait, I think someone explained this already... |
|
|
|
Post by Mezzaphor on Oct 26, 2013 20:58:51 GMT
Fear not. All will be revealed. ...is that a paler version of Garfield that's in a good mood? It's a photoshop mashup of "grafics cat" and the "doge" dog. >2004 + 32>Not knowing grafics cat
They rise like smoke and they fall like snow |
|
