|
Post by Weeaboo on Oct 18, 2013 7:55:46 GMT
I decided to try it myself.
|
|
|
Post by Bob, Squirrel King on Oct 18, 2013 23:56:43 GMT
I had been planning on doing something else with these, so I figured why not add them here as well.
|
|
|
Post by imaginaryfriend on Oct 19, 2013 2:37:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 19, 2013 4:01:41 GMT
Love the pigeon one
|
|
|
Post by CoyoteReborn on Oct 22, 2013 23:22:19 GMT
Why has no one seen fit to render my handsome likeness?
|
|
|
Post by Xan on Oct 23, 2013 0:02:23 GMT
Why has no one seen fit to render my handsome likeness? You are being unfair, Lord Coyote:
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 23, 2013 0:27:34 GMT
Why has no one seen fit to render my handsome likeness? You are being unfair, Lord Coyote: That's his silly face, not his handsome face
|
|
|
Post by CoyoteReborn on Oct 23, 2013 0:53:45 GMT
Oh, there it is! Though I do have many wonderful characteristics (like my great strength and my all-around awesomeness), I'm afraid I'm not known to be the most careful of readers.
Carry on.
|
|
|
Post by Nnelg on Oct 24, 2013 6:25:46 GMT
Love the pigeon one I agree, I think the pigeon one works the best.
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 24, 2013 15:52:19 GMT
Love the pigeon one I agree, I think the pigeon one works the best. Maybe it should have a speech bubble saying something incredibly absurd, that would make it funnier
|
|
|
Post by Nnelg on Oct 24, 2013 17:12:22 GMT
Nah. That'd spoil the "style in symplicity" thing that makes it so good in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 24, 2013 19:09:09 GMT
Nah. That'd spoil the "style in symplicity" thing that makes it so good in the first place. Fair enough
|
|
|
Post by Corvo on Oct 25, 2013 19:35:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 26, 2013 2:22:48 GMT
I love them all ...except... would it be rude if I said the first one was terrible? (jk) I can't remember where the 3rd one was from...
|
|
|
Post by Corvo on Oct 26, 2013 3:04:26 GMT
I love them all ...except... would it be rude if I said the first one was terrible? (jk) I can't remember where the 3rd one was from... Thanks! Uh, wait, terrible? It's the mouth, isn't it? I knew it should be upside down! Damn those boxbots and their terrible mouths! The 3rd one ain't an avatar, it's a nobodie.
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 26, 2013 3:41:04 GMT
I love them all ...except... would it be rude if I said the first one was terrible? (jk) I can't remember where the 3rd one was from... Thanks! Uh, wait, terrible? It's the mouth, isn't it? I knew it should be upside down! Damn those boxbots and their terrible mouths! The 3rd one ain't an avatar, it's a nobodie. I didn't actually notice that I just said it was terrible because it was boxbot in general. Oh, I see now
|
|
|
Post by Corvo on Oct 26, 2013 4:00:41 GMT
I didn't actually notice that I just said it was terrible because it was boxbot in general. Hahaha, I know, I know, I'm just joking over my mistake.
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 26, 2013 4:03:50 GMT
I didn't actually notice that I just said it was terrible because it was boxbot in general. Hahaha, I know, I know, I'm just joking over my mistake. Understood
|
|
|
Post by Corvo on Oct 27, 2013 2:33:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by thedoctor on Oct 27, 2013 7:47:19 GMT
Hey, what software are you guys using to do this? I'm trying to do a similar thing, but I can't figure out how to layer two pictures over each other and make one selectively see-through.
|
|
|
Post by Gotolei on Oct 27, 2013 8:49:39 GMT
Hey, what software are you guys using to do this? I'm trying to do a similar thing, but I can't figure out how to layer two pictures over each other and make one selectively see-through. What OS are you using? Assuming Windows, the main ones I can think up off the top of my head are Gimp, Photoshop and Paint.NET. Gimp and Photoshop are pretty full-featured (yet complicated) while Paint.NET is pretty simple from what I recall. Still pretty powerful though. Photoshop costs money, the other two are free.
|
|
|
Post by keef on Oct 27, 2013 14:10:55 GMT
Hey, what software are you guys using to do this? I'm trying to do a similar thing, but I can't figure out how to layer two pictures over each other and make one selectively see-through. What OS are you using? Assuming Windows, the main ones I can think up off the top of my head are Gimp, Photoshop and Paint.NET. Gimp and Photoshop are pretty full-featured (yet complicated) while Paint.NET is pretty simple from what I recall. Still pretty powerful though. Photoshop costs money, the other two are free. Or Photofiltre. Both a shareware and free version.
|
|
|
Post by Corvo on Oct 27, 2013 16:15:12 GMT
Hey, what software are you guys using to do this? I'm trying to do a similar thing, but I can't figure out how to layer two pictures over each other and make one selectively see-through. Try Pixlr. It's online, free and pretty good. Easy to use too.
|
|
|
Post by imaginaryfriend on Oct 28, 2013 4:23:15 GMT
Hmm... kinda running out of ideas. Will probably quit soon. Also: Nobody interested in my counter-challenge regarding parodies of the Proboards badges banner-ad, I see?
|
|
|
Post by Covalent on Oct 28, 2013 5:02:23 GMT
Hahaha, is that Antimony's old head from the early comic? Also.. where did the first face come from?
|
|
|
Post by imaginaryfriend on Oct 28, 2013 5:44:29 GMT
Hahaha, is that Antimony's old head from the early comic? Yes, more or less. Old lemon-head Annie took a surprising amount of time to convincingly render in grayscale and I wound up having to make a few cheats here and there, like the shoulders. Also.. where did the first face come from? Mr. Siddell has slapped a generic face like that on a number of characters through the comic but that particular one was on Baz when he was explaining how his couch got broken in antiquity. Though I did turn down the right corner just a tad so it didn't meet the edge of the face at a bad place.
|
|
|
Post by Gotolei on Oct 28, 2013 8:04:56 GMT
I tried something a bit different.. ..emphasis on "tried"
|
|
|
Post by Xan on Oct 28, 2013 11:16:33 GMT
I tried something a bit different.. ..emphasis on "tried" This is actually very good, though I don't fully agree with the grey background.
|
|
|
Post by Gotolei on Oct 28, 2013 16:11:26 GMT
I tried something a bit different.. ..emphasis on "tried" This is actually very good, though I don't fully agree with the grey background. Yeah, I'm not too sure what to put in that area.. Trying to keep it close to the original (ie recognizable), hence the middle part being the lighter color. Might mess with it later to fix the outline though. The technique only works properly for thicker lines I guess.. (..but when it does, it works well :D )
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 28, 2013 20:31:31 GMT
This is actually very good, though I don't fully agree with the grey background. Yeah, I'm not too sure what to put in that area.. Trying to keep it close to the original (ie recognizable), hence the middle part being the lighter color. Might mess with it later to fix the outline though. The technique only works properly for thicker lines I guess.. (..but when it does, it works well :D )
The focal point in this is the blue, because its the greatest contrast with the grey. Is it what you were aiming for?
|
|