|
Post by Snes on Aug 25, 2010 7:01:21 GMT
[765]Kat's hair is growing on me. Well, it's growing on Kat's head, but my appreciation for Kat's hair is growing as well.
|
|
|
Post by harmony on Aug 25, 2010 7:03:09 GMT
Haha, nice. I love Kat wearing leggings!
|
|
|
Post by Snes on Aug 25, 2010 7:06:28 GMT
So why don't they just get Robot to drop it? It's already been shown that he can leave the Court grounds without setting off the alarm.
And why do they let kids wander outside the front gate? Why not keep the door locked instead of setting up an alarm that goes off when they set foot off the bottom step.
|
|
|
Post by edzepp on Aug 25, 2010 7:06:38 GMT
Maybe they could fly it over. snes: Don't think I haven't forgotten that little bit of nonsense a second ago. I'm watching you.
|
|
|
Post by Snes on Aug 25, 2010 7:13:09 GMT
Maybe they could fly it over. snes: Don't think I haven't forgotten that little bit of nonsense a second ago. I'm watching you. Who do they know that can fly? And I have no idea what you're talking about.
|
|
|
Post by edzepp on Aug 25, 2010 7:13:47 GMT
Riiiiiiiight.
|
|
|
Post by joephlommin on Aug 25, 2010 7:14:02 GMT
Wait she cant step off the stairs? Cmon Its still the school grounds. For them to go to the edge and toss it cant be against the rules...
|
|
lovecraft1024
Full Member
What does anything mean? Basically
Posts: 118
|
Post by lovecraft1024 on Aug 25, 2010 7:14:27 GMT
Kat sounds like she's channeling some 19th century Victorian inventor!
|
|
|
Post by Max on Aug 25, 2010 7:15:41 GMT
And why do they let kids wander outside the front gate? Why not keep the door locked instead of setting up an alarm that goes off when they set foot off the bottom step. Well, it's been established that the court encourages kids to break the rules by making security systems that are fairly easy to circumvent.
|
|
|
Post by harmony on Aug 25, 2010 7:15:54 GMT
And why do they let kids wander outside the front gate? Why not keep the door locked instead of setting up an alarm that goes off when they set foot off the bottom step. Because Gunnerkrigg's security is perty lame. Do you guys think ether-Annie could fly? Edit: haha Max! You beat me to posting. I was thinking of Tom's comment too.
|
|
|
Post by eightyfour on Aug 25, 2010 7:16:29 GMT
Ahaha, nicely played, Mr. Siddell, nicely played indeed! ;D For reference: #6, last panel
|
|
|
Post by Casey on Aug 25, 2010 7:22:45 GMT
I'm one to tend to believe that everyone gets all the references, but I have to remind myself that I've probably read ch. 1 over 100 times in the course of the GKCFP. I have to say, I was amused at how even Kat's pose is the same as Annie's was. That was funny.
On another note, to all the speculators from the last page's discussion thread: seriously, ever heard of Occam's Razor?
|
|
lovecraft1024
Full Member
What does anything mean? Basically
Posts: 118
|
Post by lovecraft1024 on Aug 25, 2010 7:23:22 GMT
Ahaha, nicely played, Mr. Siddell, nicely played indeed! ;D For reference: #6, last panelAha! Indeed - explains everything.
|
|
preus
Full Member
Posts: 246
|
Post by preus on Aug 25, 2010 7:31:21 GMT
Nice. Very self-referential. Glad to see Tom's not above poking fun at GC's melodramatic beginnings.
|
|
|
Post by King Mir on Aug 25, 2010 7:46:53 GMT
At least this time it's not a problem that can easily be solved with a remote controlled toy car...
Or maybe it could be.
|
|
|
Post by Snes on Aug 25, 2010 8:14:26 GMT
At least this time it's not a problem that can easily be solved with a remote controlled toy car... Or maybe it could be. If 80's children's films taught me anything, it's that all problems can be solved with a remote controlled toy car.
|
|
|
Post by hal9000 on Aug 25, 2010 8:28:50 GMT
It's a good idea, in theory. With a robotic arm (or catapult, for that matter), you can control and vary the power and angle of the shot exactly, and it'd be relatively easy to write a program to calculate (or hell, calculate by hand) the exact angle and power required to hit the correct spot on the ravine bottom. If you were feeling ambitious, you could even include a wind speed sensor and use the data from that to compensate for wind.
It's also rather overkill, but the best home projects usually are ;D
|
|
|
Post by Casey on Aug 25, 2010 8:42:16 GMT
Here's an easier way that I just thought of as I was sitting here.
Tie a string to it that is longer than the distance from the steps to the edge.
Throw it as hard as you please, and don't let go of the other end. It would end up dangling from the string, resting against the cliff face.
Then you just let go of the string. Problem solved.
|
|
|
Post by penguinfactory on Aug 25, 2010 8:55:44 GMT
Does anyone else think the "chibi" (for lack of a better word) versions of the characters Tom has been using lately are absolutely adorable? See the second lat panel for an example.
|
|
|
Post by Chemical Rascal on Aug 25, 2010 9:08:39 GMT
Here's an easier way that I just thought of as I was sitting here. Tie a string to it that is longer than the distance from the steps to the edge. Throw it as hard as you please, and don't let go of the other end. It would end up dangling from the string, resting against the cliff face. Then you just let go of the string. Problem solved. But that's the non-hardcore way. And it doesn't provide an outlet for Kat's genius. And Kat's genius needs an outlet. Believe it.
|
|
|
Post by Gemini Jim on Aug 25, 2010 9:35:25 GMT
what a wonderfully goofy page I immediately noticed Kat's "robotic throwing device"; it almost sounds like she's mocking Annie. And then check out Annie's reaction.... not only is she doing an awesome "this is my serious face" Jones imitation, but she is tossing a giant lampshade on the whole idea. * also, we now know that if being a tech genius doesn't work out, Kat has the patented Donlan Slowball to fall back on. * and, another appearance of chibi Annie and Kat, along with a completely superfluous "not to scale" sign on the illustration XD
|
|
|
Post by King Mir on Aug 25, 2010 10:18:53 GMT
Here's an easier way that I just thought of as I was sitting here. Tie a string to it that is longer than the distance from the steps to the edge. Throw it as hard as you please, and don't let go of the other end. It would end up dangling from the string, resting against the cliff face. Then you just let go of the string. Problem solved. That might work, but there's a risk that the stone will bounce off the cliff face on the way down. Still way easier then building a robot though, and so worth a try.
|
|
|
Post by Alexandragon on Aug 25, 2010 10:22:04 GMT
Do you guys think ether-Annie could fly? [704] Nice. Very self-referential. Glad to see Tom's not above poking fun at GC's melodramatic beginnings. As well as I. It's not the style of GC story on core piece of the story. It's a good idea, in theory. With a robotic arm (or catapult, for that matter), you can control and vary the power and angle of the shot exactly, and it'd be relatively easy to write a program to calculate (or hell, calculate by hand) the exact angle and power required to hit the correct spot on the ravine bottom. If you were feeling ambitious, you could even include a wind speed sensor and use the data from that to compensate for wind. It's also rather overkill, but the best home projects usually are ;D In practice in the given situation it is easier and more reliable to use a cord or cable adhered to object which will compensates discrepancies of a throwing. But that's the non-hardcore way. And it doesn't provide an outlet for Kat's genius. And Kat's genius needs an outlet. Believe it. Haha. You are completely right) She does not search easy ways to the decision of problems. Always, as I see.
|
|
|
Post by agasa on Aug 25, 2010 10:41:48 GMT
Here's an easier way that I just thought of as I was sitting here. Tie a string to it that is longer than the distance from the steps to the edge. Throw it as hard as you please, and don't let go of the other end. It would end up dangling from the string, resting against the cliff face. Then you just let go of the string. Problem solved. That might work, but there's a risk that the stone will bounce off the cliff face on the way down. Still way easier then building a robot though, and so worth a try. make a LONG string, and use it as a reel. if it bounces wrong, simply pull back and make it descend slowly! Either that, or use an etheric-aided guided rocket system on which to mount the stone! Voila, problem solved.
|
|
|
Post by Alexandragon on Aug 25, 2010 10:51:09 GMT
make a LONG string, and use it as a reel. if it bounces wrong, simply pull back and make it descend slowly! Either that, or use an etheric-aided guided rocket system on which to mount the stone! Voila, problem solved. Ahaha) Thanks) Now I think that Kat's idea isn't crazy) Because there are also more "non-hardcore" ways, as I could see.
|
|
|
Post by King Mir on Aug 25, 2010 11:52:22 GMT
make a LONG string, and use it as a reel. if it bounces wrong, simply pull back and make it descend slowly! The problem with that is then the string has to be within a somewhat narrow range of lengths. Too long, and you can't reel it in. Too short and it doesn't make it to the bottom. But it's a tall cliff face, you don't want to be measuring the length of the string precisely. You want a plan that either uses a short string that barely makes it over the edge, or a whole spool. Using a whole spool is worth a try as a one shot deal. Throw the spool, with the stone in the center or tied to the inner end of the string, and hold the normal end as it falls. The problem with Kat's plan of building a catapult, is that the trajectory will still be parabolic. You'd have to shoot very high to it to be approximately flat going down the side of the ravine.
|
|
|
Post by Alexandragon on Aug 25, 2010 12:02:10 GMT
make a LONG string, and use it as a reel. if it bounces wrong, simply pull back and make it descend slowly! The problem with that is then the string has to be within a somewhat narrow range of lengths. Too long, and you can't reel it in. Too short and it doesn't make it to the bottom. But it's a tall cliff face, you don't want to be measuring the length of the string precisely. You want a plan that either uses a short string that barely makes it over the edge, or a whole spool. Using a whole spool is worth a try as a one shot deal. Throw the spool, with the stone in the center or tied to the inner end of the string, and hold the normal end as it falls. The problem with Kat's plan of building a catapult, is that the trajectory will still be parabolic. You'd have to shoot very high to it to be approximately flat going down the side of the ravine. Maybe this situation just need attaching a parachute to the stone.
|
|
|
Post by King Mir on Aug 25, 2010 12:05:04 GMT
Nice. Very self-referential. Glad to see Tom's not above poking fun at GC's melodramatic beginnings. The melodrama was a comedic effect in the first place. "Only one sensible resolution to the problem." Tom's eluding to an old joke.
|
|
|
Post by legion on Aug 25, 2010 13:38:16 GMT
I still say they should seek Mort's help. We haven't seen him for a while, actually.
|
|
|
Post by nikita on Aug 25, 2010 13:49:41 GMT
Ahaha, nicely played, Mr. Siddell, nicely played indeed! ;D For reference: #6, last panelIndeed ;D Though Annie's remark is a bit much in my opinion. PS: One solution to their problem is to hurl it against one of the lamps were it bounces off into the right direction.
|
|