|
Post by hal9000 on Apr 14, 2010 20:35:40 GMT
Why are you talking about the DEA? Just pointing out that as chemicals go, that particular one is not the easiest to get ahold of without attracting a lot of attention, is all. EDIT: fixed broken quotes
|
|
|
Post by violet on Apr 14, 2010 21:06:52 GMT
Just pointing out that as chemicals go, that particular one is not the easiest to get ahold of without attracting a lot of attention, is all. :-p (Mine was intended as good-natured ribbing, to be clear.)
|
|
|
Post by todd on Apr 14, 2010 22:17:25 GMT
Don't worry, Kat will construct a realistic android body for S13 so he can become a real boy and he and Kat make little biomechanical babies or some such cliché crap. Are we reading the same comic? I think that the original poster intended that as a protest against the presence of comic-relief robots in the webcomic to begin with.
|
|
|
Post by TBeholder on Apr 15, 2010 0:30:18 GMT
And, apparently, on the outskirts of Zimmingham. You think there are any blinking lights available at all? Nobodies could even outlaw them. Are we reading the same comic? Probably, yes, but the amount of fan-art you mix it with seems to be drastically different. Why are you talking about the DEA? I see only one way American DEA may be related to that English Court: by association with Court robots. Incompetence + comic relief + bodily harm = ?
|
|
|
Post by violet on Apr 15, 2010 16:55:36 GMT
Probably, yes, but the amount of fan-art you mix it with seems to be drastically different. Eh? "Now what are you doing?" "Plot device." "It'll provide a convenient deus ex machina in 5 or 6 pages." That's explicitly not what deus ex machina means.
|
|
optern
Junior Member
Posts: 84
|
Post by optern on Apr 15, 2010 18:25:04 GMT
Goodness gracious, you folks, you are out of your heads. We've seen one page of one character attaching devices to a wall and suddenly you're off the rails. Can we at least wait until we know what's up with Jack before we go vomiting accusations against the skill of the author? My god, you people would probably read one sentence of Walden and assume it ends in a firefight, because Thoreau is a hack like that.
|
|
|
Post by violet on Apr 15, 2010 19:10:03 GMT
My god, you people would probably read one sentence of Walden and assume it ends in a firefight, because Thoreau is a hack like that. I threw God of Small Things across the room when it turned out that Estha and Rahel were actually step-siblings and Sophie was just very depressed at being so far from the coast of her beloved Norway. So derivative.
|
|
|
Post by tyler on Apr 15, 2010 21:18:53 GMT
Goodness gracious, you folks, you are out of your heads. We've seen one page of one character attaching devices to a wall and suddenly you're off the rails. Can we at least wait until we know what's up with Jack before we go vomiting accusations against the skill of the author? My god, you people would probably read one sentence of Walden and assume it ends in a firefight, because Thoreau is a hack like that. This happens every page with certain folks. The wild speculation thread is no longer sufficient to contain it.
|
|
|
Post by the bandit on Apr 19, 2010 20:49:45 GMT
This happens every page with certain folks. The wild speculation thread is no longer sufficient to contain it. God help us.
|
|