|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 31, 2013 15:13:31 GMT
 Kat is smooth with the ladies. Literally the most embarrassing collection you could show off to your squeeze. Is boxbot singular, or are there multiple models? |
|
|
|
Post by Xan on Oct 31, 2013 16:30:45 GMT
Literally the most embarrassing collection you could show off to your squeeze. Is boxbot singular, or are there multiple models? Technically, yes. There's also a close relative, Robox. But I suspect that modern-day Boxbot is a single character rather than many lookalikes. |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 31, 2013 22:24:17 GMT
Is boxbot singular, or are there multiple models? Technically, yes. There's also a close relative, Robox. But I suspect that modern-day Boxbot is a single character rather than many lookalikes. The real question is, is boxbot more terrible that robox? |
|
|
|
Post by Xan on Oct 31, 2013 22:28:24 GMT
The real question is, is boxbot more terrible that robox?  |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Oct 31, 2013 22:29:44 GMT
The real question is, is boxbot more terrible that robox? ...so, who's third place?  |
|
|
|
Post by admiralcheez on Nov 1, 2013 1:05:15 GMT
...so, who's third place? Probably this guy. |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Nov 1, 2013 3:32:22 GMT
...so, who's third place? Probably this guy. But he's technically a boxbot subspecies. In fact, he's the original design for the current model. So... would he place first or second? |
|
|
|
Post by Mezzaphor on Nov 1, 2013 3:34:48 GMT
Boxbot Prime possessed a fancier, more ornate terribleness. In contrast, the more recent generations of Boxbots are just so efficient at being terrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Nov 1, 2013 3:39:21 GMT
Boxbot Prime possessed a fancier, more ornate terribleness. In contrast, the more recent generations of Boxbots are just so efficient at being terrible. Ah yes, but we are now comparing two styles of terribleness. I suppose it is up to the viewer to decide now. |
|
|
|
Post by Daedalus on Nov 1, 2013 3:41:36 GMT
Boxbot Prime possessed a fancier, more ornate terribleness. In contrast, the more recent generations of Boxbots are just so efficient at being terrible. Ah yes, but we are now comparing two styles of terribleness. I suppose it is up to the viewer to decide now. How do you judge relative magnitudes of infinity? (difficult without them being tied to a common variable #yaycalculus) |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Nov 1, 2013 3:44:26 GMT
Ah yes, but we are now comparing two styles of terribleness. I suppose it is up to the viewer to decide now. How do you judge relative magnitudes of infinity? (difficult without them being tied to a common variable #yaycalculus) An infinity of terribleness? That can't be possible... There must be a limit to his terribleness, otherwise every being within a 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999jasioufh caoeufhansd cfu >system failed< |
|
|
|
Post by Daedalus on Nov 1, 2013 3:57:29 GMT
There must be a limit to his terribleness Funny that you're speaking about limits... have you taken Calculus before? |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Nov 1, 2013 4:02:20 GMT
There must be a limit to his terribleness Funny that you're speaking about limits... have you taken Calculus before? ...Really? Dude, I'm in freaking grade nine. NO. |
|
|
|
Post by Daedalus on Nov 1, 2013 4:06:25 GMT
Funny that you're speaking about limits... have you taken Calculus before? ...Really? Dude, I'm in freaking grade nine. NO. I took it in grade 10. Ah well. It's just ironic to talk about something called a limit: that's actually the name of what you'd use to solve that type of problem. Very surreal. |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Nov 1, 2013 4:10:37 GMT
...Really? Dude, I'm in freaking grade nine. NO. I took it in grade 10. Ah well. It's just ironic to talk about something called a limit: that's actually the name of what you'd use to solve that type of problem. Very surreal. I have a test on polynomials and crap tomorrow. Don't make my head hurt D: |
|
|
|
Post by freeformline on Nov 1, 2013 6:00:46 GMT
I took it in grade 10. Ah well. It's just ironic to talk about something called a limit: that's actually the name of what you'd use to solve that type of problem. Very surreal. I have a test on polynomials and crap tomorrow. Don't make my head hurt D: Heh. I should tell you about the math that I'm doing at university. Talk about making your head hurt! Advanced warning: If you plan on going to college and following a technical route, be sure to familiarize yourself with proofs/formal logic and linear algebra in addition to your calculus. But I digress. The original Boxbot is clearly less terrible than its modern day counterpart, as it will continue to function as a basic feather duster long after its primary functions have finally ceased (thank goodness). |
|
|
|
Post by GK Sierra on Nov 1, 2013 6:16:49 GMT
Boxbot Prime possessed a fancier, more ornate terribleness. In contrast, the more recent generations of Boxbots are just so efficient at being terrible. Boxbot would be more useful if he teamed up with Robox. |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Nov 1, 2013 15:17:30 GMT
Boxbot Prime possessed a fancier, more ornate terribleness. In contrast, the more recent generations of Boxbots are just so efficient at being terrible. Boxbot would be more useful if he teamed up with Robox. I see your point. Maybe if boxbot were fastened to roboxes head in some way? Though you must consider that their combined terribleness would lead to excessive stumbling. |
|
|
|
Post by Gotolei on Nov 1, 2013 15:35:31 GMT
Boxbot would be more useful if he teamed up with Robox. I see your point. Maybe if boxbot were fastened to roboxes head in some way? Though you must consider that their combined terribleness would lead to excessive stumbling. It's been explored a bit in the past, I don't recall the consensus about it though. |
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Nov 1, 2013 15:46:32 GMT
I see your point. Maybe if boxbot were fastened to roboxes head in some way? Though you must consider that their combined terribleness would lead to excessive stumbling. It's been explored a bit in the past, I don't recall the consensus about it though. I would speculate that boxbot would probably roll off the second after that picture was taken But his Dave glasses do up his nonexistent awesomeness by a tad. |
|
|
|
Post by Gotolei on Nov 5, 2013 3:31:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Nov 5, 2013 4:25:16 GMT
No, Kat! I thought you didn't want her to know about your collection?! |
|
|
|
Post by The Anarch on Nov 18, 2013 8:19:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by quinkgirl on Nov 18, 2013 16:44:09 GMT
...why are recent posts all about Kat thinking of boxbot? ...or was it the avatar guy? |
|
|
|
Post by atteSmythe on Nov 18, 2013 18:02:59 GMT
...why are recent posts all about Kat thinking of boxbot? ...or was it the avatar guy? Kat has been thinking about Paz, which is wonderful. The edits have her thinking about Boxbot, which is terrible. This juxtaposition is funny. |
|
|
|
Post by The Anarch on Nov 18, 2013 18:29:46 GMT
...why are recent posts all about Kat thinking of boxbot? ...or was it the avatar guy?  |
|
|
|
Post by Gotolei on Nov 18, 2013 19:43:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Señor Goose on Nov 18, 2013 21:36:14 GMT
...why are recent posts all about Kat thinking of boxbot? ...or was it the avatar guy?   Well look at you. |
|
eskhn
Full Member
You like 'em? Huh? You like 'em?
Posts: 167
|
Post by eskhn on Nov 18, 2013 22:23:49 GMT
There really is no end to the forms Coyote can take. (don't want to spoil it) |
|
|
|
Post by Gotolei on Nov 18, 2013 22:48:25 GMT
There really is no end to the forms Coyote can take. (don't want to spoil it) Hm, what kind would he be if he were to do that? Psychic/dark? Certainly not electric  |
|
