ty
New Member
Posts: 23
|
Post by ty on Dec 15, 2013 10:13:57 GMT
I keep seeing boxbot while I read the comics, but when it comes to editing I get tired half way through...  |
|
|
|
Post by fish on Mar 1, 2014 0:12:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by dante on Mar 14, 2014 9:45:13 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2014 10:44:42 GMT
A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare to it now.
»HELLLOOOOOOOO«
|
|
|
|
Post by Max on Mar 15, 2014 3:39:59 GMT
It is too late for all of us.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Anarch on Mar 15, 2014 4:52:40 GMT
It's too late
tonight
to drag the boxbot into the light
|
|
|
|
Post by rosencrantz on Mar 15, 2014 21:58:28 GMT
Replace the "R"'s in panel 1, and it's perfect. |
|
|
|
Post by dante on Mar 16, 2014 3:13:04 GMT
I tried to make it a HELLOOOOOOOO, but gave up almost immediately.
|
|
chaosvii
Junior Member
I absolutely did not expect this!
Posts: 84 
|
Post by chaosvii on Mar 16, 2014 20:45:15 GMT
I tried to make it a HELLOOOOOOOO, but gave up almost immediately. I made a similarly ineffective endeavor if that makes you feel any better. |
|
|
|
Post by Per on Mar 16, 2014 21:09:08 GMT
I went so far as to replace the Rs with a gradient, then insert an enlarged version of the "helloooo" speech ballon, but it just didn't look good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xan on Mar 17, 2014 0:10:16 GMT
Replace the "R"'s in panel 1, and it's perfect. Done and done.  |
|
|
|
Post by dante on Mar 17, 2014 2:21:21 GMT
Dang that's nice.
|
|
chaosvii
Junior Member
I absolutely did not expect this!
Posts: 84
|
Post by chaosvii on Mar 17, 2014 2:48:16 GMT
Replace the "R"'s in panel 1, and it's perfect. [Done and done.jpg] You have my admiration good sir. |
|
|
|
Post by SilverbackRon on Mar 17, 2014 6:26:40 GMT
Replace the "R"'s in panel 1, and it's perfect. Done and done. Truly, the Nazi's had developed the most terrible weapon of war ever! |
|
|
|
Post by legion on Mar 17, 2014 13:56:36 GMT
Technically they did; they invented sarin nerve agent and n-stoff; they didn't dare to use them, thinking the enemy would retaliate with similar weapons (that they actually didn't have) (same reason the UK didn't use their anthrax cultures during the war).
|
|
|
|
Post by sidhekin on Mar 17, 2014 14:15:22 GMT
Wow. So, if the Nazis had used sarin, the UK might have answered with anthrax? And vice-versa? And the fear of mutual mass destruction kept both sides from using such weapons?
That's ... balance of terror during an otherwise all-out war?
I think that's the weirdest thing I've heard all year.
|
|
|
|
Post by philman on Mar 17, 2014 18:30:45 GMT
Wow. So, if the Nazis had used sarin, the UK might have answered with anthrax? And vice-versa? And the fear of mutual mass destruction kept both sides from using such weapons? That's ... balance of terror during an otherwise all-out war? I think that's the weirdest thing I've heard all year. See, there was a good old balance of all out destruction going along with WMD in Europe, then we had to go spoil it all by taking it out on Hiroshima... Although to be fair, the Germans weren't exactly stuffy about using gas in their camps, just not in bombs. |
|
|
|
Post by GK Sierra on Mar 20, 2014 23:39:00 GMT
It is remarkable the aversion that all great powers developed to using poison gas. Things could so easily have been much, much worse in that conflict, but both sides refrained. My grandfather served with the 7th Chemical Depot Company and was assigned to create inventories of mustard gas and other chemical weapons the Nazi's had stored in bunkers all across Europe, he said the enormity of the supplies amazed him.
I wish he was still around so I could ask him if he saw any Sarin.
|
|
|
|
Post by Per on Apr 11, 2014 20:30:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Nnelg on Apr 14, 2014 7:42:28 GMT
Done and done. Truly, the Nazi's had developed the most terrible weapon of war ever! Terrible, yes. I doubt boxbot could kill than one person, even falling at terminal velocity. You'd be better off dropping a sack of bricks. Wow. So, if the Nazis had used sarin, the UK might have answered with anthrax? And vice-versa? And the fear of mutual mass destruction kept both sides from using such weapons? That's ... balance of terror during an otherwise all-out war? I think that's the weirdest thing I've heard all year. See, there was a good old balance of all out destruction going along with WMD in Europe, then we had to go spoil it all by taking it out on Hiroshima... Although to be fair, the Germans weren't exactly stuffy about using gas in their camps, just not in bombs. If a line was crossed in bombing Japan, it was done with firebombs and not nukes. Firebombing took more than twice as many lives as both nukes combined. |
|
|
|
Post by Ophel on Apr 14, 2014 7:58:21 GMT
I'd like to call out "Godwin's Law". I know no one is arguing, but I'm just surprised that it can inexplicably be in effect even in a friendly discussion about falling boxbots.
No, I do not hope for any further development of my point. I just want to point out something that took me by surprised.
|
|
|
|
Post by zimmyzims on Apr 14, 2014 10:24:48 GMT
I'd like to call out "Godwin's Law". I know no one is arguing, but I'm just surprised that it can inexplicably be in effect even in a friendly discussion about falling boxbots. No, I do not hope for any further development of my point. I just want to point out something that took me by surprised. Ummmm.... when the subject is Germany bombing England in WWII, it is natural that Nazis, or Germany that in this context means the Germany of Nazis, will be mentioned at some point. Namely at the point where you mention the party of the war that was executing the aforementioned bombings. That does not enable you to call Godwin's law. Godwin's stupid law concerns Nazi-analogies, it has nothing to do with discussion that actually concerns Nazis themselves. If it was applicable to this context, it would be equal to a law stating that "when talking about Nazis, in some amount of time eventually somebody always ends up mentioning Nazis", or something to that effect. Should we really be surprised? I am not. |
|
|
|
Post by philman on Apr 14, 2014 11:45:24 GMT
I'd like to call out "Godwin's Law". I know no one is arguing, but I'm just surprised that it can inexplicably be in effect even in a friendly discussion about falling boxbots. No, I do not hope for any further development of my point. I just want to point out something that took me by surprised. Ummmm.... when the subject is Germany bombing England in WWII, it is natural that Nazis, or Germany that in this context means the Germany of Nazis, will be mentioned at some point. Namely at the point where you mention the party of the war that was executing the aforementioned bombings. That does not enable you to call Godwin's law. Godwin's stupid law concerns Nazi-analogies, it has nothing to do with discussion that actually concerns Nazis themselves. If it was applicable to this context, it would be equal to a law stating that "when talking about Nazis, in some amount of time eventually somebody always ends up mentioning Nazis", or something to that effect. Should we really be surprised? I am not. Ugh, trying to create drama by bringing up rules that don't even apply to the situation, that's such a nazi thing to do... |
|
|
|
Post by keef on Apr 14, 2014 12:41:21 GMT
Ummmm.... when the subject is Germany bombing England in WWII, it is natural that Nazis, or Germany that in this context means the Germany of Nazis, will be mentioned at some point.  |
|
|
|
Post by zimmyzims on Apr 15, 2014 8:53:34 GMT
Ummmm.... when the subject is Germany bombing England in WWII, it is natural that Nazis, or Germany that in this context means the Germany of Nazis, will be mentioned at some point. Namely at the point where you mention the party of the war that was executing the aforementioned bombings. That does not enable you to call Godwin's law. Godwin's stupid law concerns Nazi-analogies, it has nothing to do with discussion that actually concerns Nazis themselves. If it was applicable to this context, it would be equal to a law stating that "when talking about Nazis, in some amount of time eventually somebody always ends up mentioning Nazis", or something to that effect. Should we really be surprised? I am not. Ugh, trying to create drama by bringing up rules that don't even apply to the situation, that's such a nazi thing to do... And here we go, a proper Godwin's law example! Thank you! |
|
|
|
Post by philman on Apr 15, 2014 15:47:38 GMT
Ugh, trying to create drama by bringing up rules that don't even apply to the situation, that's such a nazi thing to do... And here we go, a proper Godwin's law example! Thank you! Indeed, and now I lose the argument too. Just like Hitler. |
|
|
|
Post by Ophel on Apr 15, 2014 16:59:45 GMT
Heheheh. You guys all have a point. I must apologise for bringing it up, then. But I must say, it amuses me that you all went along with it anyway. You guys are the best.
|
|
|
|
Post by admiralcheez on Apr 19, 2014 17:56:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Gotolei on Jul 28, 2014 7:38:23 GMT
X-post from the thread for 1385:  |
|
|
|
Post by Daedalus on Jul 28, 2014 7:39:55 GMT
YESSSSSSSSSSSS we see her for what she truly is!
|
|
