|
|
Post by aaroncampbell on Aug 6, 2010 6:18:33 GMT
Okay, so here goes my first attempt. Go easy on me! Kat is building a body for Robot using Boxbot parts, but is finally overwhelmed with disgust. Robot tries to put the best face on it that he can, but even his kind and cheerful spirit is dampened. :-( I've never made something terrible on purpose. I feel... ashamed. I am sorry.  |
|
|
|
Post by aaroncampbell on Aug 8, 2010 22:45:15 GMT
Ha! I didn't see Ulusses' page when I started on mine (the immediate previous post,) but they work so nicely together! I think I subconsciously wrote the page before his, so I'm bumping his image to follow mine. Nice work, Ulysses! I know what you mean about it taking forever. It's definitely worth it -- or rather, we are both terrible. A two-page story arc in this thread? For shame! (Anyone want to go for three, and do this page next?  ) This took so long. I hope it's worth it.  |
|
Illy
New Member
Helloooo!
Posts: 6 
|
Post by Illy on Aug 17, 2010 4:31:19 GMT
Oh man. This was fun.  Attachments:
|
|
Illy
New Member
Helloooo!
Posts: 6
|
Post by Illy on Aug 17, 2010 5:08:51 GMT
And another...  |
|
Illy
New Member
Helloooo!
Posts: 6
|
Post by Illy on Aug 17, 2010 18:43:45 GMT
Should I edit my previous posts with these?   |
|
|
|
Post by judgedeadd on Aug 18, 2010 5:31:33 GMT
So that's why Boxbot is named Boxbot!
|
|
|
|
Post by joephlommin on Aug 18, 2010 18:39:26 GMT
So that's why Boxbot is named Boxbot! no its because its shaped like a box. and hes a robot |
|
|
|
Post by Chemical Rascal on Aug 20, 2010 12:36:40 GMT
Unless he's shaped like a robot. And he's a box.
|
|
|
|
Post by joephlommin on Aug 20, 2010 19:52:22 GMT
Unless he's shaped like a robot. And he's a box. *Face palm* |
|
|
|
Post by judgedeadd on Sept 12, 2010 21:03:09 GMT
Time to revive this with more crossovers Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Seraphnite on Sept 13, 2010 10:34:00 GMT
 You can pretty much do this to any page. |
|
|
|
Post by Per on Sept 13, 2010 15:07:15 GMT
You can pretty much do this to any page. That was the original point of this thread! I noticed that people were ascribing a dozen different and contradictory mental states to boxbot in the comments and forum, and theorized that Tom had drawn him so perfectly blankly that anywhere you inserted that picture, it would soak up context like a box-shaped sponge. |
|
|
|
Post by Seraphnite on Sept 13, 2010 15:13:48 GMT
haha nice. Though I should mention... that sponges are box-shaped.
|
|
|
|
Post by Per on Sept 13, 2010 19:09:54 GMT
Sponges are pretty terrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by legion on Sept 13, 2010 20:41:58 GMT
Sponges are animals without respiratory, digestive, circulatory, sensitive nor NERVOUS system. They should be plant. But they're animals. What. And you still can't use them if you're a vegan. Aw. (But somehow it's okay to eat a venus flytrap which is way more evolved, eats animals, but is a plant).
|
|
|
|
Post by evilanagram on Sept 13, 2010 20:47:06 GMT
Sponges are animals without respiratory, digestive, circulatory, sensitive nor NERVOUS system. They should be plant. But they're animals. What. And you still can't use them if you're a vegan. Aw. (But somehow it's okay to eat a venus flytrap which is way more evolved, eats animals, but is a plant). Venus flytraps aren't "more" evolved. They simply evolved along different paths. |
|
|
|
Post by jayne on Sept 13, 2010 21:56:24 GMT
If we're going to get philosophical, does 'more evolved' = better?
If we're not, how do you eat a Venus flytrap? I'm guessing with pasta...
|
|
|
|
Post by legion on Sept 13, 2010 22:06:56 GMT
Gah, you know what I mean: I say "more evolved" for "more structurally elaborate".
|
|
|
|
Post by zylonbane on Sept 13, 2010 23:41:06 GMT
Almost too obvious, I'm afraid:  |
|
|
|
Post by jayne on Sept 14, 2010 0:51:11 GMT
Someone said boxbot was like a sponge...  By jhayn at 2010-09-13 |
|
|
|
Post by TBeholder on Sept 14, 2010 10:28:48 GMT
Gah, you know what I mean: I say "more evolved" for "more structurally elaborate". You wasn't yet introduced into wonderful world of Tunicata?  Someone said boxbot was like a sponge... By jhayn at 2010-09-13 This... is... terrible! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by legion on Sept 14, 2010 14:24:50 GMT
Gah, you know what I mean: I say "more evolved" for "more structurally elaborate". You wasn't yet introduced into wonderful world of Tunicata? Tunicates are not sponges >:V |
|
|
|
Post by evilanagram on Sept 15, 2010 15:48:54 GMT
If we're going to get philosophical, does 'more evolved' = better? People tend to think of it that way, but they're wrong. For example: Boxbot's design has evolved from the original series of robots Diego built, but he's so much more terrible than they are. |
|
|
|
Post by jayne on Sept 15, 2010 15:53:58 GMT
If we're going to get philosophical, does 'more evolved' = better? People tend to think of it that way, but they're wrong. For example: Boxbot's design has evolved from the original series of robots Diego built, but he's so much more terrible than they are. Ah, so Protoboxbot is not as terrible as Boxbot...who is terrible. |
|
|
|
Post by damilo on Sept 15, 2010 16:39:49 GMT
Nice one, Zylonbane.
|
|
blastdragon
Junior Member
The Flying Dutchman
Posts: 65
|
Post by blastdragon on Sept 15, 2010 18:57:28 GMT
But if Boxbot is terrible, then he is also terrible in everything he does. But that would mean he is terrible in being terrible. But if you are terrible in being terrible, you are not terrible....WAAAAH!
This is just as weird as: There is one lie in this sentence.
|
|
|
|
Post by Per on Sept 15, 2010 19:15:53 GMT
That's a terrible sentence.
|
|
|
|
Post by jayne on Sept 15, 2010 19:18:22 GMT
But if Boxbot is terrible, then he is also terrible in everything he does. But that would mean he is terrible in being terrible. But if you are terrible in being terrible, you are not terrible....WAAAAH! As terrible as he is, he is not the best at being terrible... he's actually quite terrible at being terrible, which means he's even more terrible. (I can keep this up for a while!) The lie in that sentence is the word "lie" |
|
|
|
Post by Casey on Sept 15, 2010 19:44:30 GMT
The lie in that sentence is the word "lie" Oooh, no, you need to think about that one some more, miss Jayne!  |
|
|
|
Post by jayne on Sept 15, 2010 19:48:18 GMT
The lie in that sentence is the word "lie" Oooh, no, you need to think about that one some more, miss Jayne! AH.... okay the lie in that sentence is that there is no lie but then there IS a lie in that sentence which means there is no lie in that sentence... Somewhere, one of Mudd's robots just exploded. |
|
)
