|
Post by edzepp on May 26, 2010 7:05:21 GMT
|
|
blastdragon
Junior Member
The Flying Dutchman
Posts: 65
|
Post by blastdragon on May 26, 2010 7:14:21 GMT
So Mr. Paranoid was right about the food? It seems so. Didn't expect that the court tracks everybody with sensors. It's a little bit creepy that the court always knows where you are. I love the 5Th panel. Renard is to small to look over the railing of the boat. And Annie face adds also to the fun. And before I forget: "Yeah Answer!"
|
|
|
Post by GK Sierra on May 26, 2010 7:18:13 GMT
And YOU said he was crazy! Ha! Ahahahaha! AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAAA!
On another note, I think we can safely conclude that the Chester and Foley houses are entirely composed of interesting "people" like Zimmy.
Possibly from whence they get their reputation.
|
|
jon77
Full Member
Posts: 245
|
Post by jon77 on May 26, 2010 7:20:09 GMT
Next question for Annie: And what about you, Ms. Jones? Are you Human?
It's interesting that Annie's first assumption is always that someone abnormal is not human (she thought Jones was a Robot)
|
|
|
Post by hal9000 on May 26, 2010 7:34:09 GMT
So, Jack was right all along.
Presumably about everything.
So, I'm guessing the 'little things' in the food are temporary, biodegradable nanomachines of some kind, since they seem to become ineffective over time when one isn't ingesting new ones (at least as far as we can tell from Jack, anyway).
Also, I'm gonna bet that since the court is only just experimenting on/"researching" Zimmy as opposed to helping her solve her problem, they don't necessarily plan on helping Jack either. If this is the case, I think he's justified in using whatever means are necessary to prevent his own capture, since that would no doubt mean being thrown in a padded cell while men in lab coats chart both his slow decline into madness and any increase in his supernatural abilities. Maybe they'll even end up using that unethically-obtained data to weaponize him, or Zimmy, or both of them.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Pitchfork on May 26, 2010 7:35:07 GMT
Oh my god the Court tracks people through their food Jack was right oh that is so creepy Next question for Annie: And what about you, Ms. Jones? Are you Human? It's interesting that Annie's first assumption is always that someone abnormal is not human (she thought Jones was a Robot) I would love for Annie to ask that question. Are there any instances of Jones dodging questions?
|
|
|
Post by Nicer Atom on May 26, 2010 8:02:47 GMT
Would we see a Thousand Eyes if the fourth panel zoomed out more? So, Jack was right all along. Presumably about everything. So, I'm guessing the 'little things' in the food are temporary, biodegradable nanomachines of some kind, since they seem to become ineffective over time when one isn't ingesting new ones (at least as far as we can tell from Jack, anyway). Or you could just, uh, "deposit" them in the Court's sewer system.
|
|
CGAdam
Junior Member
Posts: 86
|
Post by CGAdam on May 26, 2010 8:26:00 GMT
I still call nanites in the meatloaf!
|
|
|
Post by hal9000 on May 26, 2010 9:25:23 GMT
Would we see a Thousand Eyes if the fourth panel zoomed out more? So, Jack was right all along. Presumably about everything. So, I'm guessing the 'little things' in the food are temporary, biodegradable nanomachines of some kind, since they seem to become ineffective over time when one isn't ingesting new ones (at least as far as we can tell from Jack, anyway). Or you could just, uh, "deposit" them in the Court's sewer system. Well, yeah, but that wouldn't be nearly as cool.
|
|
|
Post by nikita on May 26, 2010 9:36:15 GMT
So maybe Jack isn't crazy at all. All the weird stuff he said turned out to be true.
|
|
|
Post by theuntowardlady on May 26, 2010 9:56:39 GMT
I think in terms of the question of whether or not Zimmy is human:
Am I the only one who's bothered by that question at all? Am I the only one who finds it very uncomfortable that she's apparently not considered human?
I understand that in a cartoon it might seem harmless enough to say that someone isn't human, but the fact of the matter is, Zimmy is human. She has emotions, she has feelings, she's understands what is happening to her. I think it would be a lot more benign if it weren't for the fact that every day, in the real world, real people are treated the same way as Zimmy is being treated by the Court; that is to say, people in the real world are treated as sub- or other than human.
This kind of dehumanization is used as a justification for everything from forced sterilization, to incarceration, to slavery, to murder and genocide, to the denial of basic human liberty, or to any number of inhumane treatments.
The list of people who are actually hurt by these kinds of attitudes is long: African Americans (slavery), Jews (genocide), the developmentally disabled (genocide, incarceration, forced sterilization, institutional rape), the mentally ill (genocide, ect...), gypsies (genocide), ect...
I think what bothers me most about Zimmy being described as subhuman, however, is the fact that Zimmy's character has always read to me as someone with mental illness. Yes, she has magical powers that cause her episodes to actually influence other people and the world around her but she is still an archetype for mental illness, people who in the real world are considered in the exact same way that the Court considers Zimmy.
I really hope that Gunnerkrigg Court makes Zimmy's humanity clear later in the story arc.
|
|
Necropaxx
Full Member
The natural choice for a shoulder to cry on.
Posts: 135
|
Post by Necropaxx on May 26, 2010 10:09:28 GMT
Alright. I think you have grossly misinterpreted what Tom is doing here. By having Antimony ask if Zimmy is human, he is in no way presenting Zimmy as having less worth than another normal human being. Tom does not do this. Ghosts, etheric creatures, fairies, heck - even the robots are "human," in that they have human qualities and are treated humanely. (With the exception of Jack, but he's not a very nice guy anyway.) I think (and this has all been my opinion, not fact) that Antimony was simply curious. After all, there are a lot of strange happenings at Gunnerkrigg Court, non-human encounters included. Tom did not mean that Zimmy was worth less, even if she wasn't human.
|
|
|
Post by avurai on May 26, 2010 10:23:43 GMT
I truly believe that Annie sees all things that can speak as equals, which has been shown to be true. I think that for Annie, this is simply a question as to what Zimmy could be classified as. There are so many strange things going on with her, she even has a demonic aura surrounding her whenever she gets angry, a sign of something going on with her that isn’t common in average human beings. She might have been a demon that took the test and became human for all we know (not that I believe that, but it hasn’t been said or denied). I think, in context, that’s a literal and harmless question, because we can’t honestly know for sure until we have all of the facts laid out in front of us.
|
|
Pig_catapult
Full Member
Keeper of the Devilkitty
Posts: 171
|
Post by Pig_catapult on May 26, 2010 10:34:54 GMT
Alright. I think you have grossly misinterpreted what Tom is doing here. By having Antimony ask if Zimmy is human, he is in no way presenting Zimmy as having less worth than another normal human being. Tom does not do this. Ghosts, etheric creatures, fairies, heck - even the robots are "human," in that they have human qualities and are treated humanely. (With the exception of Jack, but he's not a very nice guy anyway.) I think (and this has all been my opinion, not fact) that Antimony was simply curious. After all, there are a lot of strange happenings at Gunnerkrigg Court, non-human encounters included. Tom did not mean that Zimmy was worth less, even if she wasn't human. Gotta agree here. In Gunnerkrigg Court, at least, while all humans are people, not all people are humans, even if they look like it. Marcia turned out to be a Dryad; The Girl in the Photo (I can't remember how to spell her name on the fly) turned out to be a Valkyrie, although there's no way Annie would have known that one. Coyote and Reynardine are magical animals, but can possess people. The suicide fairies still think and act like the faeries they used to be, despite being in a human body. So, more precisely, Annie is asking Jones, "Is Zimmy a human, as opposed to being an elf, a robot, an angel, a demon, an energy being, a face spider, a faerie, a changeling, a nymph, a shape-shifter, or one of any number of other sapient magical beings that could conceivably take the shape of a member of the species homo sapien?", but that'd be pretty long for Tom to fit inside that speech bubble.
|
|
lovecraft1024
Full Member
What does anything mean? Basically
Posts: 118
|
Post by lovecraft1024 on May 26, 2010 10:43:00 GMT
Alright. I think you have grossly misinterpreted what Tom is doing here. By having Antimony ask if Zimmy is human, he is in no way presenting Zimmy as having less worth than another normal human being. Tom does not do this. Ghosts, etheric creatures, fairies, heck - even the robots are "human," in that they have human qualities and are treated humanely. (With the exception of Jack, but he's not a very nice guy anyway.) I think (and this has all been my opinion, not fact) that Antimony was simply curious. After all, there are a lot of strange happenings at Gunnerkrigg Court, non-human encounters included. Tom did not mean that Zimmy was worth less, even if she wasn't human. Gotta agree here. In Gunnerkrigg Court, at least, while all humans are people, not all people are humans, even if they look like it. Marcia turned out to be a Dryad; The Girl in the Photo (I can't remember how to spell her name on the fly) turned out to be a Valkyrie, although there's no way Annie would have known that one. Coyote and Reynardine are magical animals, but can possess people. The suicide fairies still think and act like the faeries they used to be, despite being in a human body. So, more precisely, Annie is asking Jones, "Is Zimmy a human, as opposed to being an elf, a robot, an angel, a demon, an energy being, a face spider, a faerie, a changeling, a nymph, a shape-shifter, or one of any number of other sapient magical beings that could conceivably take the shape of a member of the species homo sapien?", but that'd be pretty long for Tom to fit inside that speech bubble. Well if Annie really was asking that, and I expect she was, note that Jones' answer was less than unequivocal. "For all intents and purposes" doesn't actually inspire confidence in my book. That answer could be used if Zimmy were actually an elf, angel, demon, etc... probably not robot... Jones' response sounds a little patronizing.
|
|
|
Post by todd on May 26, 2010 10:44:16 GMT
Maybe they'll even end up using that unethically-obtained data to weaponize him, or Zimmy, or both of them. I don't think that the Court would go that far. Whatever Gunnerkrigg's faults, it doesn't strike me as a stereotypical "out-to-rule-the-world" mad scientist organization. (Indeed, I don't think that any "mad scientist" out to take over the world is a true scientist; a true scientist pursues scientific knowledge for its own sake, out of interest in it. The "mad scientist" bent on world domination is just a would-be conqueror who uses science and technology as a tool - and who probably views science with a tone similar to that of C. S. Lewis' Screwtape: "Alas, alas, that knowledge, in itself so hateful and mawkish a thing, should yet be necessary for Power!") Certainly, I don't think that the Donlans or Eglamore seem like the kind of people who'd work for a corrupt group of powermongers (unless they're really good actors who've been concealing their true natures all along) - and I don't think that such an interpretation of Gunnerkrigg would fit the tone of the webcomic, either.
|
|
|
Post by La Goon on May 26, 2010 10:45:05 GMT
Ghosts, etheric creatures, fairies, heck - even the robots are "human," in that they have human qualities and are treated humanely. Actually, judging from the guidelines to robot handling robots aren't generally viewed as being worthy of humane treatment. Also at one occasion Annie refers to Mort as "just a ghost" implying that a ghost is less worthy than a living human. She probably momentarily diverged from her ideals because she was angry, but still; that idea must come from somewhere (and it's not really appropriate for a medium in training now that I think of it).
|
|
troll
Junior Member
Posts: 53
|
Post by troll on May 26, 2010 11:38:06 GMT
So Zimmy is an unsupervised, unaccountable 80lb ball of mayhem, Jack isn't crazy (although he may be murderous in the pursuit of his own interests), and the Court's traditional response to all this is to pass the popcorn.
|
|
|
Post by legion on May 26, 2010 11:42:40 GMT
I like that, when an obviously paranoid character turns out to have been right all along.
|
|
|
Post by hal9000 on May 26, 2010 12:03:58 GMT
Maybe they'll even end up using that unethically-obtained data to weaponize him, or Zimmy, or both of them. I don't think that the Court would go that far. Whatever Gunnerkrigg's faults, it doesn't strike me as a stereotypical "out-to-rule-the-world" mad scientist organization. (Indeed, I don't think that any "mad scientist" out to take over the world is a true scientist; a true scientist pursues scientific knowledge for its own sake, out of interest in it. The "mad scientist" bent on world domination is just a would-be conqueror who uses science and technology as a tool - and who probably views science with a tone similar to that of C. S. Lewis' Screwtape: "Alas, alas, that knowledge, in itself so hateful and mawkish a thing, should yet be necessary for Power!") Certainly, I don't think that the Donlans or Eglamore seem like the kind of people who'd work for a corrupt group of powermongers (unless they're really good actors who've been concealing their true natures all along) - and I don't think that such an interpretation of Gunnerkrigg would fit the tone of the webcomic, either. Well, it's hardly fair to say that such an aim is out of the realm of possibility. Plenty of (incredibly) unethical things were done in the name of advancing science in periods of crisis by otherwise normal, reasonable individuals. Most of them weren't "mad scientists" in the classical sense, and many of them (arguably) didn't even work for people who were out for world domination. Take, for instance, Unit 731, or the medical section at Birkenau during world war 2. The regimes responsible for both of these places did terrible, monstrous things under the banner of advancing science, but the people actually carrying out the dirty work were not, by and large, monstrous and depraved individuals. Most of them were merely following orders. And, this kind of thing didn't end with WWII, either. The United States government sponsored unethical research into radiation-related diseases from the late 1940s into the early-mid 1960s, exposing everyone from US military personnel to pregnant women and children to dangerous, debilitating amounts of radiation. And, of course, there were MK-ULTRA tests and various other chemical/biological weapon experiments during that time period also. I know a few people who work for the US Government who aren't bad sorts. Some of them might be aware of what that government has done and sponsored terrible things in the past, even, though they probably don't think those things will happen again. You know what else? I suspect that if those people were told that something terrible and unethical needed to happen, and they were given minimally sufficient justification for it, most of them would go along. The article linked below runs down the list of terrible things done in the name of science pretty comprehensively, and has plenty of sources cited if you find it all too incredible to otherwise believe (I know I did when I first read it): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_experimentation_in_the_United_States It should be noted that this is just the list of things done in the US, and furthermore just the stuff that is known to the public. So in conclusion I think that the court might just have good people in it, working for it, who aren't aware of all that goes on within its borders. There might even be some of those who are aware, but who do nothing for some reason.
|
|
Mar
New Member
Posts: 16
|
Post by Mar on May 26, 2010 12:15:11 GMT
So in conclusion I think that the court might just have good people in it, working for it, who aren't aware of all that goes on within its borders. There might even be some of those who are aware, but who do nothing for some reason. To add onto that; terrible things can also be done to people "for their own good", even against their will. Take the information linked below for example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dax_Cowart
|
|
|
Post by Casey on May 26, 2010 13:12:07 GMT
My responses so far:
1) In the context of this comic, questioning something's humanity can't be interpreted as implying they are sub-human. By statistics, in the context of this comic it is more likely meant to imply that they are super-human. So there goes that argument.
2) Just because a crazy character was right about something doesn't make him no longer crazy. Anyone who lures a classmate and her supernatural sidekick out in the middle of the night, tricks the latter into a torture trap, and leaves the former stuck there to take the blame for it, all for the sake of setting a distraction to aid him in obsessively hunting down another classmate, is clearly not operating within the bounds of common and acceptable human behavior.
|
|
|
Post by djublonskopf on May 26, 2010 13:27:35 GMT
Well, it's hardly fair to say that such an aim is out of the realm of possibility. It is fair, however, to say that such an aim is outside of anything even hinted at within the comic thus far. The experiments we've seen so far involve draining water from a lake, lovingly caring for trees in a giant park, and NOT surveilling someone who's different (Zimmy). Oh, and trying to remove a body-stealing demon from its host without killing the host. This isn't exactly Nazi concentration camp science going on. (Yes, there was one awful thing done to Jeanne, by people who are no longer alive, and which is unknown to the people who are now alive.) The idea that the Court is doing horrible, torturous, debasing experiments on people is about as supported by the comic thus far as suggesting that the Court is actually run by Ancient Sumerian magicians who wanted to open a time-portal to the Wild West (to become cowboys) but missed a little and decided to open a school in England instead. It's possible, but it has not been suggested by the comic itself yet.
|
|
|
Post by hal9000 on May 26, 2010 13:38:10 GMT
Well, it's hardly fair to say that such an aim is out of the realm of possibility. It is fair, however, to say that such an aim is outside of anything even hinted at within the comic thus far. The experiments we've seen so far involve draining water from a lake, lovingly caring for trees in a giant park, and NOT surveilling someone who's different (Zimmy). This isn't exactly Nazi concentration camp science going on. (Yes, there was one awful thing done to Jeanne, by people who are no longer alive, and which is unknown to the people who are now alive.) Suggesting that the Court is doing horrible, torturous, debasing experiments on people is about as supported by the comic thus far as suggesting that the Court is actually run by Ancient Sumerian magicians who wanted to open a time-portal to the Wild West (to become cowboys) but missed a little and decided to open a school in England instead. It's possible, but it has not even been suggested by the comic itself yet. Oh, I never said they were doing experiments on the same scale or to the same depravity as the ones I listed, just that the evidence so far seemed to point to a decided lack of ethical consideration regarding experimentation/research on human beings. I mainly cited those to prove the point that it isn't just "mad scientists" who do bad things for science. That said, you left out "did nothing to treat, alleviate or contain Zimmy's condition, in spite of its direct negative effect on both her and other children at the school (mostly Gamma, but also everyone she inadvertantly sucked into Birminghell)" and "ran power station experiments knowing full well that they would fuck with Zimmy's head (leading directly to aforementioned Birminghell trip)" in your list of experiments. Perhaps not on par with Mengle, but certainly not acceptable to any modern bioethics board I'm aware of.
|
|
|
Post by djublonskopf on May 26, 2010 13:42:37 GMT
I would love for Annie to ask that question. Are there any instances of Jones dodging questions? She did dodge once, on the question of her allegiance to the court/forest: here.
|
|
|
Post by djublonskopf on May 26, 2010 13:56:52 GMT
Oh, I never said they were doing experiments on the same scale or to the same depravity as the ones I listed, just that the evidence so far seemed to point to a decided lack of ethical consideration regarding experimentation/research on human beings. I mainly cited those to prove the point that it isn't just "mad scientists" who do bad things for science. That said, you left out "did nothing to treat, alleviate or contain Zimmy's condition, in spite of its direct negative effect on both her and other children at the school (mostly Gamma, but also everyone she inadvertantly sucked into Birminghell)" and "ran power station experiments knowing full well that they would fuck with Zimmy's head (leading directly to aforementioned Birminghell trip)" in your list of experiments. Perhaps not on par with Mengle, but certainly not acceptable to any modern bioethics board I'm aware of. But they did do something to treat/alleviate Zimmy's condition: they left her alone. They don't subject her to surveillance because it puts her on edge. And they know that Gamma helps, so they let her hang with Gamma. That shows some regard for her well being, and it would absolutely fly with a bioethics board. It's never been said that the Court does or doesn't know anything more about what to do for Zimmy. But what Jones has just said is that they do know two things that help Zimmy, and they give her both. And they in no way have said or indicated or hinted that they knew that the power station experiments would mess with Zimmy's head.
|
|
|
Post by Casey on May 26, 2010 13:57:24 GMT
That said, you left out "did nothing to treat, alleviate or contain Zimmy's condition, in spite of its direct negative effect on both her and other children at the school (mostly Gamma, but also everyone she inadvertantly sucked into Birminghell)" and "ran power station experiments knowing full well that they would fuck with Zimmy's head (leading directly to aforementioned Birminghell trip)" in your list of experiments. Perhaps not on par with Mengle, but certainly not acceptable to any modern bioethics board I'm aware of. You are assuming that there is anything that CAN be done about Zimmy's condition and that they are just choosing not to do it. You are also assuming that they knew the effect that the power station was having on her. They certainly didn't know she was anywhere near it, because they're not tracking her. And they're not tracking her because doing so puts stress on her. And they want to spare her undue stress. Does that sound like an unethical institution to you?
|
|
|
Post by hal9000 on May 26, 2010 14:14:54 GMT
That said, you left out "did nothing to treat, alleviate or contain Zimmy's condition, in spite of its direct negative effect on both her and other children at the school (mostly Gamma, but also everyone she inadvertantly sucked into Birminghell)" and "ran power station experiments knowing full well that they would fuck with Zimmy's head (leading directly to aforementioned Birminghell trip)" in your list of experiments. Perhaps not on par with Mengle, but certainly not acceptable to any modern bioethics board I'm aware of. You are assuming that there is anything that CAN be done about Zimmy's condition and that they are just choosing not to do it. You are also assuming that they knew the effect that the power station was having on her. They certainly didn't know she was anywhere near it, because they're not tracking her. And they're not tracking her because doing so puts stress on her. And they want to spare her undue stress. Does that sound like an unethical institution to you? Well, if no treatment or cure is available (which would imply a rather unfortunate end for Jack, I'm afraid), then certainly they could at least arrange things so that she wouldn't expose others to her condition (unless they were not aware of it being contagious, I suppose). As for them not knowing about the effects of the power station, Jones apparently knew quite well how Zimmy was affected, as explained on the last page. And if she knew, why wouldn't she inform the group in charge of the power station? And the not tracking her, well, even if they stop tracking her, they can still track Gamma, who will not generally leave her side at any point.
|
|
CGAdam
Junior Member
Posts: 86
|
Post by CGAdam on May 26, 2010 14:28:55 GMT
My interpretation of the last few comics indicates the Court only knew the power station affected Zimmy because Annie just now told them. If they don't track her, they'd have no way of knowing she was even there that night. If they were tracking Gamma, they might've known she was there, but that still doesn't give much reason to suspect they knew what happened. By and large, the Court higher-ups seem to follow the "true neutral" standard of operations.
|
|
|
Post by Casey on May 26, 2010 14:40:53 GMT
I'm with Adam: I re-read, and I saw no indication at all that the Court or Jones had, or even have now, any idea what effect the Station has on Zimmy.
|
|